fastC

Compare

Pick your fight, fairly.

Each of these pages is structured the same way: a paragraph of what the other language is good at, a table of grounded rows, and a verdict that says where each language wins.

  • fastC vs Rust
    The obvious comparison.
    Rust has more safety machinery and a vastly larger ecosystem. fastC has structural answers to build.rs, capability typing, and compile-time budgets that Rust cannot retrofit without breaking its ecosystem.
  • fastC vs Zig
    The closest in spirit.
    Zig wins on cross-compilation maturity and C-interop. fastC chooses capability typing and mandatory contracts over comptime as the wedge for agent-generated code.