Blog
Notes on the language.
Field notes on what changes when agents write the systems code and humans review it. Some posts are language-design rationale; some are concrete bug-shape catalogues; some are honest comparisons against other languages.
- What goes wrong when LLMs write C: the recurring bugs The bug shapes we see over and over when an agent generates C, and which of them fastC structurally prevents, converts into a build-time trap, or simply makes louder.
- Reading fastC: side-by-side syntax with plain C A column-by-column tour. If you can read C, you can read fastC in twenty minutes — but the things that look the same do not always mean the same thing.
- Why agent-friendly is a real language design goal "Designed for LLMs" sounds like marketing. It is not. Here is the concrete list of language-design choices that change when the modal author of code is a stochastic process.
Subscribe via RSS or read the source at github.com/Skelf-Research/fastc.